Solved
Here's the situation: We have an existing PRODUCT, which comes in three colors. We do not get to choose the colors. We order a dozen, and get random colors. When we purchased and received this PRODUCT, we entered it on a single SKU. All we cared about was how many units of PRODUCT we had in the store. People could choose whatever color they wanted to.
Now we want to sell PRODUCT online. In-store, customers can take whatever color they want, but online we need to know which color they want, so we have created PRODUCT-RED, PRODUCT-WHITE, and PRODUCT-BLUE. We need an accurate inventory of each color.
Our existing inventory was purchased in a prior year, so this isn't as simple as updating the orders. We have 14 units of PRODUCT, and that's what our inventory reflects. Of those 14, we have 3 x PRODUCT-RED. 6 x PRODUCT-WHITE, and 5 x PRODUCT-BLUE.
How do I move the inventory from the one original SKU to the three new SKUs and maintain accurate costs for each item?
Good afternoon, @Repurposed.
I appreciate you coming back and giving us some additional details.
Since you're having trouble getting a direct answer, I recommend contacting our Customer Support Team for further assistance. They'll be able to use a screen share tool to review your account with you and explain some more information in details for you. Here's how:
- Go to the Help ? icon in the top right-hand corner.
- Press the Contact Us button.
- Enter your question and tap Let's talk.
- Scroll down and choose to Get a callback.
Keep us updated on how the call goes. I'm only a post away if you need me again. Take care!
OK, after creating test inventory items and running some tests, I can confirm that what suggests definitely doesn't work.
If I create new items for the colors and then do an inventory adjustment, the value of what I subtract from the original PRODUCT SKU goes to Inventory Shrinkage, but the value of the color-specific SKUs is entered as zero. Presumably that's based on an average cost of zero.
If PRODUCT-RED, PRODUCT-WHITE, and PRODUCT-BLUE have an average cost already (i.e. I've already made some purchases), then it assigns each color's cost average to the quantities adjusted into inventory. Better, but it probably won't balance.
This is where it becomes clear that the tracking of inventory and its value in QuickBooks Online was an afterthought.
Chat GPT kept suggesting journal entries to move the total inventory value for each item and then quantity adjustments to update the inventory. A journal entry can only move values between accounts, though, and all four SKUs in this scenario share the same Inventory Asset account. In other words, I can move the valuation of PRODUCT out of the Inventory Asset account, but then I'm putting it right back in the same Inventory Asset account. There is no way to credit it to a particular product. We went over that five times before I gave up, relatively comfortable that AI won't be taking over the world this week.
So the issue becomes moving both quantities and costs, and there's only one way I can see to do that:
A Vendor Credit for the total quantity and cost of PRODUCT. I'm removing all of the existing inventory and its total value.
Then, on the same Vendor Credit, negative quantity "returns" to each of the color-specific SKUs. (Remember: Since it's a Vendor Credit, positive values are inventory out while negative values are inventory in, but the rate is always positive.) The goal here is for the total of the Vendor Credit to be zero: the same total amount out of the Inventory Asset account, and then back in—but attached to new products.
If you're FIFO, that complicates things, but for cost averaging, this is close enough for me.
Until someone can tell me why this doesn't work, this is the solution.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
